Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

25 April 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< April 24	April 26 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Vaiben Solomon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article clearly fails wikipedia notability guidelines for people. They were apparently convicted of a crime and then became wealthy. Can't verify sources, lacks inline citation. Cautiously, I state that this article may have some themes of antisemitism, particularly the trope of "criminal jew becomes wealthy" or "jew sees the light and becomes good." AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 03:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Australia. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 03:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Montenegrin pro-government protests

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of the 2022 Montenegrin crisis and doesn't have much significance to have a separate article A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Montenegro. A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Gruenewald

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. The current sources in the article are primary and a search elsewhere didn't reveal any significant coverage. Let'srun (talk) 01:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Florida, New York, and South Carolina. Let'srun (talk) 01:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:afd2|text=War on terrorism WP:CRUFT by a now WP:CBANed editor. Egregious failure of [[WP:OR[[ and WP:SYNTH and utterly lacks focused WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:GNG.

Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Qaeda safe houses, Kabul, which the community reached consensus to delete. Longhornsg (talk) 01:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)|pg=Al Ghuraba training camp|cat=S}}[reply]

Also nominating the following related pages that meet the same deletion criteria:

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Military, Terrorism, Afghanistan, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 01:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Enrique Montana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to have the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. The current sources are primary to the clubs Montana has played for and a search elsewhere revealed nothing but namedrops and unrelated people. Let'srun (talk) 01:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, South Carolina, and Washington. Let'srun (talk) 01:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Schmoll

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. The best I could find was 3 sentences of coverage at [[1]]. Let'srun (talk) 01:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Switzerland, England, and New York. Let'srun (talk) 01:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ladder scene

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Firstly, this is not a discussion I am creating on the grounds of notability. I have no doubts that this subject is technically "notable". However, it is a clear violation of WP:NOPAGE and WP:MERGEREASON, which I feel are two policies often forgotten about when creating a page (someone can make a page on something, but nobody asks if they should).

With that out of the way, I will say flat out that there is almost nothing to say about the ladder scene in MGS3 besides the fact that it exists. It can literally be summarized in a singular sentence on the lines of "At one point in the game, the player has to climb an extremely tall ladder for three minutes." Maybe give a few sentences in the reception section of the game article about how the scene was interpreted by critics or how it inspired other sections in other games, and boom. You've summarized the subject without leaving out any important information. Because no other information exists.

And to further reaffirm what I mean by that, I am the primary author of Snake Eater (song), as well as the user who got it to GA status. That song is most commonly associated with this scene. However, the song I believe warranted a spin-out because not only did it demonstrate notability, but there was information about its development and analysis of its lyrics. There is a complete article to be had there that covers all the bases that should be expected out of a spinout. Now go back to "That song is most commonly associated with this scene." As a result of that, I have basically checked every source that exists regarding this scene. For further reassurance, I also checked every source cited on this page (except the Metagaming book). Yet, there remains almost nothing to be said about the subject beyond a sentence or two and something that could easily be contained within a Reception and/or Legacy section within the article for MGS3. A proper, encyclopedic article on something like this cannot exist solely because of what critics thought of it. It needs context and reasoning as to why it should have a separate article. See WP:NOPAGE and WP:MERGEREASON.

Basically, there is nothing to be said about this scene. It is "notable", but also fails WP:NOPAGE and MERGEREASON, with almost no development info or anything beyond the fact the scene exists and how journalists reacted to it. You could easily summarize this in the article for Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater with little to no consequences towards its coverage. In-fact, covering the subject in an article that actually discusses it as part of the greater subject (and therefore, giving more context) would likely benefit coverage of the scene. I suggest either a merge or a redirect to Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater. λ NegativeMP1 01:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. λ NegativeMP1 01:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Richie Schlentz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to have the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:SPORTSBASIC. The current sources in the article are primary to the clubs the subject played for and a search elsewhere didn't reveal anything that would help this subject meet the GNG. Let'srun (talk) 00:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania. Let'srun (talk) 00:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]